Understanding Relevant Conduct in Federal Drug Cases and Its Impact on Sentencing

If you or a loved one is facing federal drug charges, it is essential to understand a key concept that could significantly impact the outcome of your case: relevant conduct. In the federal criminal justice system, relevant conduct plays a critical role in determining sentencing. While the term may sound straightforward, its application can be complex and often works to the prosecution's advantage. However, understanding how relevant conduct works and having an experienced federal defense attorney can make all the difference in your case.

Federal sentencing guidelines in drug cases can be confusing; however, we are here to help you. At Perlman Defense Federal Criminal Lawyers, we put the needs of our clients first. Our federal criminal defense lawyers will leave no stone unturned as we advocate for your rights. Learn more about relevant contact below. Then, contact our federal criminal defense attorney to schedule a free case consultation.

Get the help you deserve for your federal drug case.

call for confidential consultation

What Is Relevant Conduct?

Relevant conduct refers to a defendant’s actions and behavior that are considered by the court during sentencing, even if those actions were not charged or resulted in a conviction. This concept comes from the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG), which guide federal judges in determining appropriate sentences for various offenses. Under the guidelines, relevant conduct can encompass:

• Uncharged Conduct: Acts that were not formally charged in the indictment.
• Dismissed Charges: Federal criminal charges that were dismissed as part of a plea agreement.
• Conduct of Co-Conspirators: In cases involving conspiracy, a defendant can be held accountable for actions committed by co-conspirators, provided those actions were reasonably foreseeable and in furtherance of the conspiracy.

In federal drug cases, relevant conduct often includes the total quantity of drugs involved, even if the defendant’s role was limited. For example, a defendant caught with a small amount of drugs could still face sentencing based on a larger drug operation if the court determines they were part of that scheme. This includes allegations of drug trafficking or drug manufacturing.

How Relevant Conduct Affects Sentencing

Relevant conduct has a significant impact on sentencing because it influences the base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines. The base offense level is a starting point used to calculate the sentencing range. Here’s how relevant conduct factors in:

• Drug Quantity: In drug cases, the base offense level is largely determined by the total quantity of drugs involved. Relevant conduct allows the court to include drug quantities beyond what was seized or charged if there is evidence linking the defendant to those amounts.
• Aggravating Factors: Relevant conduct can introduce aggravating factors, such as the use of a firearm, involvement of minors, acts of violence, or other forms of criminal conduct. These factors can lead to enhancements that increase the sentencing range.
• Criminal History: Relevant conduct may also influence the court’s assessment of the defendant’s criminal history or pattern of behavior, potentially resulting in a higher sentence. This includes jointly undertaken criminal activity.

The Broad Scope of Relevant Conduct

One of the most challenging aspects of relevant conduct is its broad scope. Federal courts use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard when determining relevant conduct, which is lower than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required for convictions. This means that:

• Prosecutors only need to show it is more likely than not that the alleged conduct occurred.
• Evidence that might not hold up at trial can still be considered at sentencing.

For example, a defendant’s connection to a larger drug conspiracy may be established through testimonies, phone records, or circumstantial evidence, even if the defendant was not directly involved in all aspects of the operation.

Challenges for Defendants

Relevant conduct can create significant challenges for defendants. Even if a person accepts a plea deal for a lesser charge, their sentence could still be based on conduct from the dismissed charges or uncharged allegations. This often comes as a surprise to defendants who expect their sentence to reflect only the specific charges to which they enter a guilty plea.

Additionally, the inclusion of relevant conduct can lead to harsh penalties, particularly in drug cases where mandatory minimum sentences may apply. For instance:

• A defendant caught with a small amount of drugs could face a lengthy sentence if the court determines they were part of a larger operation involving significant drug quantities.
• A minor participant in a drug conspiracy could be held accountable for the full scope of the conspiracy if their involvement was reasonably foreseeable.

The Importance of a Skilled Federal Defense Attorney

Given the high stakes, it is crucial to have a skilled federal defense attorney who understands the nuances of relevant conduct and can effectively challenge its application. Here’s how an Perlman Defense Federal Criminal Lawyers can help:

1. Scrutinizing the Evidence: A defense attorney can carefully examine the prosecution’s evidence to challenge the inclusion of uncharged or speculative conduct.
2. Arguing for Limited Accountability: In conspiracy cases, an attorney can argue that the defendant’s role was minor and that they should not be held accountable for the actions of co-conspirators.
3. Presenting Mitigating Factors: Defense attorneys can present evidence of mitigating circumstances, such as the defendant’s lack of criminal history, efforts at rehabilitation, or limited involvement in the offense.
4. Advocating for Downward Departures: If the court finds relevant conduct applicable, an attorney can still advocate for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines based on factors such as cooperation with authorities or other mitigating considerations.

Real-World Examples of Relevant Conduct

To illustrate the impact of relevant conduct, consider the following scenarios:

• Scenario 1: The Drug Mule A defendant is caught transporting a small quantity of cocaine. However, during sentencing, the prosecutor presents evidence that the defendant made multiple trips as part of a larger drug trafficking organization. The court considers the total quantity of drugs transported by the organization, resulting in a significantly higher sentence.
• Scenario 2: The Street-Level Dealer A street-level dealer is charged with selling a few grams of methamphetamine. Testimony from co-conspirators suggests the dealer was part of a network responsible for distributing several kilograms. The court includes the entire network’s drug quantity in the relevant conduct analysis, leading to a much higher sentencing range.
• Scenario 3: The Cooperative Defendant A defendant charged with drug possession agrees to cooperate with authorities. Despite providing valuable information, the prosecutor introduces uncharged conduct during sentencing. However, the defense attorney successfully argues for a reduced sentence due to the defendant’s cooperation and minimal role in the offense.

Tips for Defendants Facing Federal Drug Charges

If you are facing federal drug charges, understanding the potential impact of relevant conduct is critical. Here are some steps you can take:

1. Contact Perlman Defense Federal Criminal Lawyers: We have had extensive experience handling federal drug cases and we are well-versed in the Sentencing Guidelines.
2. Be Honest and Transparent: Provide your attorney with all relevant information about your case, as this will help them build a strong defense.
3. Understand the Plea Agreement: Before accepting a plea deal, ensure you understand how relevant conduct might influence your sentence.
4. Advocate for Your Role: If your involvement in the offense was limited, we can argue for a sentence that reflects your actual role.

Relevant conduct is a critical but often misunderstood aspect of federal drug cases. Its broad application can result in sentences that far exceed the severity of the charged offense, making it essential for defendants to have a comprehensive understanding of this concept. With the guidance of a skilled federal defense attorney, you can challenge the inclusion of unfair or unsubstantiated relevant conduct and advocate for a fair and just sentence.

Facing federal drug charges?
Contact Perlman Criminal Defense Lawyers

call (818) 383-6692

Contact Our Federal Drug Crimes Lawyer for a Free Case Consultation

At Perlman Defense Federal Criminal Lawyers, we know that facing a federal indictment is stressful. However, you have the right to an attorney, and we would be honored to defend you. If you or someone you know is facing federal drug charges, don’t face the complexities of the legal system alone. Contact Perlman Defense Federal Criminal Lawyers Today!